![]() ![]() This convention states that the last OBX segment ( denoted the “display segment” ) in the message should carry the full human-readable report, including supporting some formatting and highlighting. The convention is enshrined in Australian Standard AS4700.2 and the associated HB262 Handbook for pathology messaging, both freely available at. Although I have never seen any figures cited, HL7 ORU messages using some variant of this convention probably constitute close to 100% of all electronic pathology result reporting in Australia. Electronic referrals and discharge summaries are also likely candidates for carrying attachments of various kinds.įor pathology test result reporting in particular, there has been a mechanism adopted in Australia for many years for carrying a human-readable rendition of the report in HL7 v2 messages. Images, HTML, RTF, Word documents, and a number of other formats can be used. Of course, PDF lab report files are not the only sort of attachment that can be carried by either of these two media. ![]() That proposal has led to an increased interest in PDF renditions of pathology reports as well as kindling an interest in how to add attachments to both HL7 v2 messages and CDA documents ( and probably via FHIR now too ). The current proposal to support this specifies that a single PDF report for each test be sent by the laboratory through to the national electronic health record system. Last year in Australia there was an agreement amongst a number of parties, led by the Australian Department of Health, for the results of diagnostic tests to be sent to the national electronic health record system for accessing by both care providers and the individuals for whom the tests were performed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |